Scientific Method and Participant Observation Essay Example for Free

Scientific Method and histrion Observation EssayIn the article, Researching Dealers and Smugglers, Patricia Adler discusses her and her husbands experience exploitation participant observation to cop data from drug dealers and the problems this qualitative mode brought. A qualitative method foc affairs on collecting rich, non-statistical data. This method involves face-to-face interviews and actual participation with the group being researched. The Adlers use this method because it is almost impossible to run across accurate information on people who smuggle drugs.This is true because they are such private and profitless people. The only way to get the real facts is if the smugglers trust the person. Unfortunately, participant observation brought problems such as the dealers and smugglers being under the influence or freeing through drug withdrawal during the interviews and the Adlers meld their overt and covert roles. The Adlers chose participant observation because they found that using this method allowed them to acquire the most in-depth and rich data than any another(prenominal) method.If criminals like dealers and smugglers were given a survey, it would not work out because they are not just going to tell the truth and risk getting caught by the police. They are specific with who they give information to, so the Adlers had to show them that they could be trusted. They could not have done that with without using participant observation. Although there were many aspects roughly the Adlers that made them and the research method they used convenient, there were overly close to risks they had to take.While doing research, the Adlers encountered some problems using this method, one of which was interviewing the dealers and smugglers while they were under the influence of either marihuana or cocaine. In addition, the participants were sometimes withdrawal symptoms, so they were not able to interview properly. Patricia mentions how marijuana a nd cocaine had different effects on the interviewees. She states, marijuana was unproductive for a number of reasons Often people became disordered, sleepy, or involved in eating to variable degrees. On the other hand, cocaine assisted the research procedure by making the dealers feel more than comfortable. Cocaine also helped the dealers open up easy. During the interviews, some dealers experienced withdrawal symptoms. It caused them to become malicious with individually other or towards the Alders without any warning. The way the Alders solved this problem was by taking precautions when interacting with the dealers.The cocaine use was not a problem for the Adlers, but they most likely dealt with the marijuana issue quite easily since Patricia does not specifically explain how it was solved. In addition, there was another problem the Adlers encountered. The Adlers also found that mixing the overt and covert roles with the members of the group throughout the investigation was a nother issue. Since the Adlers had different level relationships with every individual, some of the dealers were aware that they were a part of a research project while others were not aware.This sometimes confused the Adlers. Patricia states, They the informants would made occasional veiled references in front of people, especially when loosened by intoxicants, that made us extremely uncomfortable. This issue made the couple uncomfortable because they did not want to blow their cover. Patricia and Peter Adler also feared that the participants would think they are police. Peter and Patricia Adler solved this issue by take the necessary safety measures so anyone they did not want to find out.The Adlers encountered various problems while utilizing this qualitative method. They had troubles such as mixing their covert and overt roles and dealing with some of the smugglers and dealers being intoxicated. Therefore this investigation became very risky, but Patricia and her husband finali zed by collecting all the data needed. The Adlers also resolved their problems in a cautious way utilizing patience, precaution, and demythologised and clever thinking. The couple definitely learned a lot throughout the experiment and got more than they pass judgment going through it.