Junk food in schools Essay

The Government had set give away a forbidding to prevent cast aside food from being sold to children at canteens. turn back Fraser had written a letter to a newspaper company called community of interests Chronicle on the 29th of October 2010 to sh are his disbelief at the presidencys vain attempt to prevent obesity. Through let out this piece, he expenditures an fight tone. He aims to target the audience of parents with children in civilises to agree with him on his rival that this vain attempt will non benefit the children.Since the beginning, Fraser views that eat habits are heavily influenced by the parents. He urges parents to take responsibility of their own children. He admits that he weighs close to 100 kilograms and further strengthens his statement by claiming that he is a trustworthy parent. He personalizes the statement and enables the audience to see him as a regular person and similarly being a trustworthy parent for his children despite being overweight. Fraser argues that children deficiency to learn self-restraint and that parents should be responsible to retrace informed decisions for their children. He implies to the audience that a responsible parent should educate their children on their food choices.Fraser quoted Dr Peter Clifton who said 37 percent of their daily energy intake is consumed at school, but only 14 percent was lunch bought from the school canteen and schools should be a focus for combating childhood obesity but strategies were needed to tackle the lunchbox, not just the school canteen. He shifts the blame from the school cafeteria to the parents, implying that the parents should make slap-up decisions for their children when packing for them.Fraser believes that the bans will have no impact on childrens eating habits. He begins by claiming this strategy will not make our children perfectly healthy eaters and it will not encourage our kids to get out and get fit. He implies that theyre other more effective solutions out there other than canteen policing. Fraser had also quoted two major principals associations that schoolboyish people consume at most 5 of their 21 meals a week at school and the policy would make kids feel that junk food is an attractive taboo. He reinforces his contention by implementing the use of expert opinion, leading the audience to be more likely to believe his contention.Lastly, Fraser expresses his concern regarding the schools finances by stating that the canteen is a major revenue enhancement stream for school funding. He suggests that once the ban is put into place, gross revenue wouldnt be too great and there schools would lose its main source of revenue. Fraser also questioned whether the governance would be allocating additional bullion for the revenue shortfall He also suggested that the government might not fund the schools revenue shortfall even if the school is affected by the ban. Fraser suggests that the ban will most likely reasonableness maj or monetary problems regarding the schools revenue steam.Fraser believed that the ban proposed by the government was plainly a waste of time. He had strongly conveyed his negative opinion toward the governments approach from the very start. He believes that childrens eating habits are majorly influenced by the parents, not the school canteens food choices. Fraser also believes that the bans will be off no impact toward childrens eating habits and at the same time also cause major financial problems for the school. He urges for the state government to wake up and see that kids need opportunities to make their own decisions and stay active.